For me, Collins completely and utterly delivered on Mockingjay. I had high hopes for the ending and she did not disappoint. In fact, I believe that Collins has elevated herself to premier author and I will be following anything else she writes here on out. I am sold on her. Done.
I thought it was appropriate that she ended up in District 12 and that overall, the ending was brilliant. It made sense with keeping Kat in character and was written in a tone that was slightly melancholy and with that usual reservation about her that ultimately carried throughout her life. A person who has experienced such extreme loss at the hands of her own decisions should realistically not get a pitch-perfect ending because that would be trite and ultimately, undersell her experiences. She bore full responsibility for being the Mockingjay - with all of the loss and triumph that it entailed. But mostly, the loss.
Also, I was particularly touched with how Kat referred to her own children as "boy" and "girl". It seemed that even in motherhood, she held her emotions in check for fear of being hurt, too invested. Growing up in the era of Hunger Games shaped (or rather, squashed?) her maternal side and that did not change, even after peace was finally achieved and even after Peeta convinced her to have children. It could also be argued that with losing Prim, Kat was never willing to invest of herself that much again in a child. And who could blame her?
Ah, Peeta..... Yes, I was on Team Peeta and yes, I loved that she ended up with him - it just made more sense to me. He was the only person in her life who could bring her any measure of peace, I think (remember all of the rooftop scenes and "Peeta comforting her at night scenes" in Catching Fire? They were the few moments in the entire trilogy where Katness seemed to be anything resembling "happy".) Yes, happiness would be overstating it, but the description of "peace" fits for what Peeta could do for her. I did have more fondness with Gale this time around, but ultimately, I think he and Katniss were too much alike, both warriors both at war with their own hard edges. She was never fully content with herself, with anything, when she was with Gale. Even all of their times together in the woods were fraught with the background tension of them being caught or with the worry of the fence being turned on. So, Peeta was the better fit for her.
I am not even sure where to begin with all of the ethical/moral ramifications of this series - a high school English teacher could have a field day with this. I did appreciate Collins' portrayal of the Kat's inner dialogue and turmoil when it came to her decisions.
This series was emotionally brutal, yes brutal. But also brilliant. I am keeping this series and not selling it, I want my children to discover it someday as they thumb through all the other books I have kept for them.
Labels: Literally Literary



















But. Still.
The Hunger Games series is like Judy Blume - you will read, you will read again and you will think. Twilight was fun, oh sure. But there was not much substance going on there.
The Hunger Games? Atwood-esque, speculative fiction set in the future that is action-packed with a delicious Love Triangle? I am so there. But! Within a seemingly simple series lay some earnest questions. How far would you go to protect the ones you love? Is it better to be loyal to a cause, or to one's self first? If caught in a war zone, is it better to just run away to safety or to stay and fight the enemy? If you stay, is it better to turn the other cheek? Or to live by the old rule "An Eye for an Eye"?
This is not to discredit Twilight for what it truly is: a fun romp through some typical teenaged angst, save for the special "sparkles". And the vampires. And the wolfpack with their six packs. Okay, okay, perhaps Twilight was a little more unique than Sweet Valley High, after all. I will grant all the Twi-Hards that much.
As a reader? I am fine with both series - both were entertaining, albeit offering different merits and quality of writing (Meyer is simply not qualified to hold Collins' inkwell. Ahem.)
As a mother? It gets trickier. I am totally down with difficult questions and serious material. My own parents did not monitor my reading material and while I probably should not have been reading Sidney Sheldon at the age of 12 or for that matter, Gone With the Wind at the age of 11, I am still grateful they let me read whatever I wanted. And I plan (or hope?) to do that with my own kids.
However, as a mother, I did have one major issue with the Twilight series - the violent, consensual sex in Breaking Dawn when Bella was still human. Bella's insistence that it was okay, despite the fact that Edward was distraught with himself, really, really disturbed me. I firmly believe it is incredibly dangerous to romanticize such a situation for impressionable young teenagers and I was so furious at those scenes that I put the book down and did not pick it back up for another 6 months. I have to wonder how many mothers out there do not even know that their daughters read such scenes -- such graphic scenes that really should be discussed. Can I repeat?
Edward was contrite over the violence of sex and Bella still insisted it was okay.
Seriously folks, that is some extremely malignant thinking and you will have difficulty convincing me that violent sex ever belongs in a series meant for teenagers. Ever.
Will I let my kids read Twilight if they want? Yes. Absolutely.
And then, I will gently nudge them towards The Hunger Games.